Quantcast
Channel: The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation » Michael Littenberg
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2

The Votes Are In — Deconstructing the 2011 Say on Pay Vote

$
0
0
Editor’s Note: The following post comes to us from Michael R. Littenberg, a partner at Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, and is based on Schulte Roth & Zabel white paper by Mr. Littenberg, Farzad F. Damania and Justin M. Neidig.

For most public companies, the 2011 annual meeting season is now over, and the first mandatory say on pay vote is behind them. Thus far, more than 2200 of the Russell 3000 companies have held say on pay votes in 2011. This White Paper analyzes the results of this year’s say on pay vote across several metrics.

An Overview of Say on Pay

As part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Section 14A(a) was added to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Pursuant to Section 14A(a) and the rules thereunder subsequently adopted by the SEC, beginning with the 2011 proxy season, most domestic public companies are required to conduct say on pay (SOP) and say on frequency (SOF) votes.

Under the SOP requirement, companies must submit named executive officer (NEO) compensation to a non-binding, or advisory, shareholder vote at least once every three years, as determined by the board.

Click here to read the complete post...


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2

Latest Images

Trending Articles



Latest Images